As part of the European Commission’s strategy for a sustainable food system, a legislative proposal of a harmonized, mandatory, front-of-pack nutrition label (FOPNL) is underway, with the aim to help consumers make healthier food choices and address the public health burden of diseases of lifestyle.
This event invited decision-maker, authority, researcher, consumer and industry representatives, to share their knowledge, experience, and expectations around FOPNL and the way forward. The discussion included important considerations such as features of importance, implications for consumers, and company learnings and best practices.
Rewatch the webinar
- Front-of-pack nutrition labelling (FOPNL) policies are one key component in driving consumer decision making.
- No FOPNL system may be perfect, but there is evidence already gathered, highlighting the impact of simpler, evaluative, color-coded labels in a busy shopping context.
- Cross-sector collaboration for healthier and more sustainable European diets is essential and FOPNL harmonization is a concrete example.
- A FOPNL can encourage and guide companies to shape public health through transparency and reformulation.
Read the Q&A
As a follow up to the event a comprehensive Q&A was created. Read it here.
Speakers and panelists
As part of the wider European Farm to Fork strategy for a fair, healthy and environmentally-friendly food system, as well as the Europe’s Beating Cancer Plan, conversations around empowering healthy consumer choices have taken center stage. As such, particular interest has been placed in a harmonized, mandatory front-of-pack nutrition labeling (FOPNL) system across all European member states, for which an impact assessment is being prepared by the European Commission.
There are a number of existing FOPNL systems, with varied features and use cases, e.g., expression of serving sizes or per 100 gram, inclusive or exclusive of positive nutrients and ingredients etc. The food and beverage industry, as represented through Unilever and Paulig in the event, contributed with diverse perspectives around different features of FOPNL, but shared a common sentiment around the ultimate goal of empowering consumers in the quest for healthier products. In this light, Unilever representative, Dr. Els de Groene, highlighted that FOPNL should help consumer choice and can act as an incentive for the industry to reformulate products, which ultimately points to product-specific FOPNL criteria, while also noting the need for real-life setting effectiveness studies. Dr. Karin Jonsson, from Paulig, exemplified the opportunity for companies to use a FOPNL (in Paulig's case Nutri-Score) as part of a comprehensive internal nutrition framework, including in goal setting, product development, and communications, and encouraged stakeholder contribution to a balanced discussion.
The panel discussion kicked off with a broad question about the opportunities and challenges of a harmonized FOPNL system. The opportunities mentioned included reduced confusion from conflicting label information, easier and healthier purchase decision-making, and optimized company operations e.g., in labeling. Regarding challenges, the panel highlighted the complexity of developing and implementing FOPNL on a broader scale, accounting for the variety of existing, localized systems, as well as the potential loss in consumer confidence due to unfamiliarity with the new label. The need for balanced conversations and a thoughtful transition plan were understood to address these challenges, and beyond (e.g., food loss, company costs).
Another noteworthy consideration when it comes to the upcoming legislative proposal on harmonized FOPNL is the benefit of its mandatory, as opposed to voluntary, nature. The panelists noted that voluntary measures may be worthwhile for positive (or endorsement) labels, while they usually fall short when it comes to products of lower nutritional quality, such as confectionery, as the food industry often omits voluntary information on poorer nutrition scoring from product labels. With the aim to facilitate consumer choice, and increase trust, through ubiquitous, consistent, and simple messaging across products and product categories, it was concluded that the case for a mandatory label is compelling, which would also create a more leveled “playing field” from a company perspective.
When considering the specific features a mandatory label should include, and the case for a mandatory or voluntary harmonization as such, the panelists all emphasized to the need for a thorough evaluation of independent, peer-reviewed scientific evidence and the subsequent implementation of an appropriate system. The current evidence points to simple, evaluative, and interpretive (i.e., color-coded) reference labels being better suited in meeting consumers’ information needs in a busy shopping context. Moreover, views and scientific interpretations around 100 gram versus portion size were shared. Other important considerations mentioned by the panelists and speakers included the need for fair judgements of food products, in line with dietary guidelines, and a continuous process of monitoring and improvement of the chosen system. Also, the significance of embedding FOPNL in other nutrition policies and standards, such as marketing practices or school meals.
The discussion concluded with a positive outlook on the power of the upcoming legislative proposal for public health in Europe, and the opportunity for the food and beverage industry to fruitfully contribute to the dialogue, and ultimately, empower consumer health and wellbeing.
- Overview of the Farm to Fork Strategy, in which the legislative proposal of the harmonization of FOPNL was announced and the Commission Report to the European Parliament and the Council regarding the use of additional forms of expression and presentation of the nutrition declaration (front-of-pack nutrition labelling).
- Two scientific literature reviews on FOPNL by the Joint Research Centre, which aims to provide evidence-based scientific support to the European policymaking process: A comprehensive review and an update of the evidence.
- Background of the European Food Safety Authority’s (EFSA) work on nutrient profiling for the development of harmonised FOPNL and the setting of nutrient profiles for restricting nutrition and health claims on foods, with particular interest in EFSA’s Scientific Advice.
Paulig is a family-owned food and beverage company, founded in 1876. The company's brands are Paulig, Santa Maria, Risenta, Liven and Poco Loco. The products are sold in more than 70 different markets around the globe. Paulig is Europe’s largest supplier of Tex Mex food. Paulig aims to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from its value chain by 50 percent by 2030, compared with the 2018 baseline. In addition, Paulig aims to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from its own operations by 80 percent by 2030. Paulig reported sales of EUR 966 million in 2021.
Communications Manager Sweden
+46 70 085 24 11